Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

GOP House would intensify scrutiny of Obama

Published: Thursday, October 21, 2010

Updated: Friday, October 22, 2010 18:10

PORTLAND, Ore.- Both the White House and the Republican congressional leadership are quietly preparing for clashes between the two branches of government that could play out if the GOP takes control of the House and presses investigations into administration actions.

Republican lawmakers who would be in charge of investigative and oversight committees plan to renew a stack of information demands that have languished before federal agencies over the previous 22 months and have indicated that, if victorious next month, they will use subpoena power if necessary to compel testimony and documents.

The White House, anticipating such moves, is considering adding lawyers to its 20-person Office of Legal Counsel, which would be at forefront of such skirmishes. Officials said they are preparing a post-election strategy likely to feature high-wattage fights between the White House and Congress.

The planning is in early stages and White House aides stress that, for now, President Obama is focused on helping Democrats protect their House and Senate majorities. As part of that effort, Obama is on a six-state swing, arriving in Portland Wednesday to press his message that GOP victories next month could thwart his agenda and usher in what he calls discredited policies from the Bush era.

But Republicans are closing in on a series of wins that could put them in control of the lower chamber, positioning them to try to roll back Obama's previous initiatives and block new ones.

House leaders said they would avoid using their power to harass the president, by investigating the president's birth certificate, for example. Obama was born in Hawaii, but some conservatives don't believe it.

"The oversight function needs to be very focused on polices that kill jobs," Rep. Eric Cantor, R-Va., said. "As long as we're focused on trying to right the ship, the American people will support our efforts."

If they win the majority, Republicans say that investigating Obama administration practices will be a special focus.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the top-ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said that if the Republicans win the House on Nov. 2, he'll direct his staff the next day to write administration officials who have ignored his previous requests for information.

As a member of the minority, Issa said that no more than 30 percent of his letters to administration officials have been answered.

As top Republican on the oversight panel, Issa has questioned how money has been spent under the federal stimulus program, and has criticized the administration's successful court challenge of Arizona's harsh immigration law.

A member of another House oversight subcommittee, Rep. Michael Burgess, R-Texas, HAS questioned details of the administration's implementation of the health care overhaul, calling brochures sent to elderly Americans "propaganda."

Issa and Burgess have complained that they've repeatedly sent letters asking for information that have been ignored.

One letter to Obama complained that agency watchdog officials known as inspectors general, charged with rooting out waste and fraud, are shorthanded. No reply arrived, Issa's office said.

Issa also has complained about federal government websites, which he said often celebrate the people in charge, but skimp on data that would be useful to the general public.

Republicans said they don't anticipate having to use their subpoena power extensively. Cantor, a House Republican leader, said that the GOP's newfound "leverage" might make subpoenas unnecessary.

Issa said he would use his subpoena power sparingly.

"My view is this: I don't expect to use it (subpoena power) often," Issa said. "I don't expect to use it lightly."

A Republican House takeover next month would set up confrontations similar to 1994 and 2006, when White House rivals seized congressional control. In 1994, a Republican rout set off a chain of events leading to the impeachment of then-President Bill Clinton.

In 2006, incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco disappointed the party's liberal base by declaring Democrats would not reciprocate by targeting President George W. Bush.

In the 1980s, President Ronald Reagan faced an array of investigations over his administration's deal to sell arms to Iran and funnel proceeds to Nicaraguan contra rebels. Then, the White House counsel's office had 12 attorneys, but added 10 more to deal with the scandal.

If the Republicans gain control of the House this year, the Obama White House inevitably will face more requests for information on sensitive topics, said A.B. Culvahouse, former White House Counsel under Reagan.

"It's just the way the process plays out," Culvahouse said in an interview. "If there are any intimations of White House involvement in sensitive or controversial decisions in major executive departments, the Congress frequently asks for any documents or information."

Whatever the partisan configuration of the Hill in 2011, administration officials know that a bulked up Republican contingent will require them to mount a strong defense.

White House senior adviser David Axelrod said that Republicans are intent on repealing the healthcare overhaul and Wall Street regulatory system that Obama signed into law. He pointed to threats by Republicans to hold up government spending measures, saying it could lead to a government shutdown.

"I don't think that's where most Americans want to go," Axelrod said.

Earlier this fall, the internal debate in the White House was over two different post-election approaches: Pushing small-bore measures through a more intransigent Congress, or fighting for goals that matter to both Obama and his base.

As of now, the White House seems to favor the latter path. Administration officials are talking about pushing an immigration overhaul and climate change legislation _ volatile political issues that will underline the differences between the two parties.

(c) 2010, Tribune Co.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

Be the first to comment on this article! Log in to Comment

You must be logged in to comment on an article. Not already a member? Register now

Log In